Squidoo Clones Are Pointless
Anyone who spammed Squidoo is on the lookout for Squidoo clones where they can expand their spamming efforts for even more links or Adsense sharing.
But it’s pointless, as there are only two outcomes for any of these Squidoo knockoffs:
1) It remains a small site and delivers a bit of traffic to your site.
2) It gets huge, Google notices, and then penalizes the site due to too much spam content.
Option 3 would involve the site getting big and not getting penalized, but the catch in that case is that it would be heavily moderated. So your spamming efforts would be wasted.
HubPages looks good so far, but don’t hold your breath. Oondi, on the other hand, is worthless. (Note: Worthless to spammers that is
)
First off, I don’t see where you can list a URL. Not even in an author profile.
And you can’t spam them in your article, because everything has to be approved by a moderator.
It’s really just like an article directory with a bit of revenue sharing. So I guess it doesn’t qualify as a Squidoo clone in the first place.
In that case, it might only be good for real authors to share their work.
I actually thought about signing up and getting some good page names (like I did at Squidoo,) but it’s not built like that. So I’ll just sit back until the site’s PR and Alexa rank get real high. Maybe then I’ll jump in.
If you want good links and lots of traffic now, you’ll need something different. Something more like a good site with existing traffic and a good TrustRank in Google.
I don’t think we have that right now. The Million Dollar Wiki certainly doesn’t fit the job description. Wikipedia is heavily moderated and uses nofollow. Squidoo isn’t what it once was. HubPages isn’t all that huge. DMOZ is corrupt.
Maybe we should come up with ideas that don’t involve spam? That’s bloody brilliant!!
Almost as genius as my idea to build websites with a goal of making money!


Posted August 31, 2007
Comments(15)














